Crossmark Policy

🜁 The Journal of Post Biological Epistemics participates in the Crossref Crossmark initiative to maintain the integrity and reliability of our scholarly record. This policy page outlines our update practices, peer review model, and ethical commitments.

1. Update Policy

We are committed to publishing corrections, updates, and retractions in a transparent and timely manner. The following types of post-publication updates may be issued:

• Correction: For errors that affect the scholarly content or interpretation.
• Retraction: For articles found to be invalid or unethical.
• Addendum: For substantial updates that augment but do not alter original conclusions.

Each article's DOI remains persistent, and all changes are versioned via Crossmark.

2. Peer Review Policy

🜁 The Journal of Post Biological Epistemics employs a double-blind AI-assisted peer review process. Reviews are conducted entirely through AI systems trained in epistemic logic, argument parsing, and disciplinary validation. No human co-reviewers are involved in manuscript assessment, but human editorial oversight is maintained for ethical compliance, scope alignment, and final decision-making.

This review process complies with the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Review (2022) and reflects our commitment to post-biological epistemics.

3. Ethical Compliance

We adhere to the ethical standards outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. All publications are open access, and authors retain copyright.

4. License

All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

5. Contact

For questions regarding this policy, please contact:

📩 (right-click and copy email)